Changes between Version 19 and Version 20 of Internal/RunningDemos


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Dec 23, 2005, 6:27:01 PM (18 years ago)
Author:
kishore
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Internal/RunningDemos

    v19 v20  
    1111The objective of this demo is to show the failure of current implementations of IEEE 802.11 infrastructure networks in supporting a large number (O(10)) of clients. The cumulative throughput at the access point (AP) is the measured and it is shown that beyond a certain number of clients, there is a sharp drop rather than graceful degradation. It is hypothesized that the 802.11 bit-rate adaptation algorithm is the primary culprit for this behavior - the algorithm does not differentiate between collision-based packet loss and packet loss due to poor channel conditions. It incorrectly infers collision-based loss as an indication to drop the bit-rate, resulting in the sharp drop in cumulative throughput.
    1212
    13 The demo itself consists of one receiver and 25 senders -- the start times of the senders are staggered (3-4 senders join the experiment in 10 second intervals). Traffic generated is UDP-CBR (constant bit-rate) at 1.5Mbps emulating high-quality video streaming from the clients to the AP.
     13The demo itself consists of one receiver and 25 senders -- the start times of the senders are staggered (3-4 senders join the experiment in 10 second intervals). Traffic generated is UDP-CBR (constant bit-rate) at 1.5Mbps emulating high-quality video streaming from the clients to the AP. All the clients and the AP use 802.11a (channel 36 (5.18Ghz)) with negligible interference from other sources.
    1414
    1515=== Steps to Execute Demo ===
     
    3434On the display machine, point your Internet Explorer or Mozilla Firefox browser to http://sb9.orbit-lab.org. What you expect to see is a page with three frames - one showing the topology of the smaller grid, one showing a control interface to change the packet size and offered load and the third with a link to plot the cumulative throughput at the access point (AP).
    3535
    36 The frame showing the topology should initially display 64 yellow boxes representing the nodes on the grid. Once the nodes in the experiment turn ON, the corresponding yellow boxes will turn green. Once the applications start on the nodes, the senders will turn blue and the receiver will turn red.
     36The frame showing the topology should initially display 64 yellow boxes representing the nodes on the grid. Once the nodes in the experiment turn ON, the corresponding yellow boxes will turn green. Once the sending and receiving applications start, the senders will turn blue and the receiver will turn red.
    3737 
    38 Click the link for the cumulative throughput in the third frame -- the expected behavior for the curve is that initially, the throughput will rise as senders are added but beyond a certain number of senders, throughput will fall drastically.
     38Click the link for the cumulative throughput in the third frame -- the expected behavior for the curve is that initially, the throughput will rise as senders are added but beyond a certain number of senders, throughput will fall drastically. The explanation for this drop is that
     39a. the current implementation of CSMA/CA fails to prevent losses from occurring in a congested environment
     40b. the 802.11 bit-rate adaptation algorithm, which believes CSMA/CA to be perfect, infers these losses to be due to poor channel (SNR) conditions and drops the bit-rate accordingly. This in turn makes the situation worse given that the same frame will now take a much longer time on the medium -- all senders will drop their rate to 6Mbps and the cumulative throughput will reflect this (it should be equal to the saturation throughput at 6Mbps).
    3941
    4042== Streaming video demo ==